My Shell Coding Conventions

When writing shell scripts, it is worth it to pay attention to details.

Here are the conventions I use when writing shell scripts.  These rules are taken from the coding conventions in Stu project, and are further maintained there.  I have omitted points that are specific to Stu.

Here’s the list:

  • Only use POSIX features of the shell and of standard tools. Read the manpage of a tool on the POSIX website,  rather than your locally installed manpage, which is likely to describe extensions to the tool without documenting them as such.
  • Sed has only basic regular expressions. In particular, no |, +, and no escape sequences like \s/\S/\b/\w. The -r and -E options are not POSIX; they are GNU and/or BSD extensions. A space can be written as [[:space:]]. + can be emulated with \{1,\}. There is no way to write alternatives, i.e., the | operator in extended regular regular expressions. (Note: there are rumors that -E is going to be in a future POSIX standard; I’ll switch to -E once it’s standardized.) Also, the b and t commands must not be followed by a semicolon; always use a newline after them when there are more commands.
  • Grep does have the -E option for extended regular expressions. Grep is always invoked with the -E or the -F option. (Using basic regular expressions with Grep is also portable, but I don’t do it.)
  • date +%s is not mandated by POSIX, even though it works on all operating systems I tried it on. It outputs the correct Unix time. There is a hackish but portable workaround using the random number generator of awk(1).
  • Shell scripts don’t have a filename suffix. Use #! /bin/sh and set the executable bit. The space after ! is not necessary, but is traditional and I think it looks good, so I always use it.
  • test does not support the -a option. Use && in the shell instead. POSIX has deprecated test -a.
  • The “recursive” option to programs such as ls(1) and cp(1) is -R and not -r. -r for recursive behavior is available and prescribed by POSIX for some commands such as rm(1), but it’s easier to always use -R. Mnemonic: Output will be big, hence a big letter. The idiomatic rm -rf is thus not recommended, and rm -Rf is used instead.
  • I use set -e. I don’t rely on it for “normal” code paths, but as an additional fail- safe. It does not work with $() commands that are used within other commands, and it also does not work with pipelines, except for the last command. When you use $(), assign its result to a variable, and then use its result from that variable. Using $() directly embedded in other commands will make the shell ignore failure of the inner shell. There is no good solution to the “first part of pipeline fails silently” problem.
  • Use $(...) instead of `...`. It avoids many quoting pitfalls. In shell syntax, backticks are a form of quote which also executes its content. Thus, characters such as other backticks and backslashes inside it must be quoted by a backslash, leading to ugly code. $(...) does not have this problem. Also, in Unicode ` is a standalone grave accent character, and thus a letter-like character. This is also the reason why ` doesn’t need to be quoted in Stu, like any other letter. The same goes for ^ and the non-ASCII ´.
  • Double-quote all variables, except if they should expand to multiple words in a command line, or when assigning to a variable. Also, use -- when passing variables as non-option arguments to programs. E.g., write cp -- "$filename_from" "$filename_to". All other invocation styles are unsafe under some values of the variables. Some programs such as printf don’t have options and thus don’t support or need --.
  • Always use IFS= read -r instead of read. It’s the safe way to read anything that’s \n-delimited.
  • To omit the trailing newline with echo, both -n and \c are non-portable. Instead, use printf. In general, printf is an underused command. It can often be used judiciously instead of echo. Note that the format string of printf should not start with a dash. In such cases, use %s and a subsequent string, which can start with a dash.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s